Explained series Episode 6 about 11 min
Agent patterns: workflows, planning, self-checks, and when more agents help
About this episode
The five AI agent workflow patterns, all worked through on one example: prompt chaining, routing, parallelization, orchestrator-workers and evaluator-optimizer. Then planning with ReAct and re-planning, why LLM self-correction needs outside feedback, and what subagents and multi-agent systems are good at and where they go wrong.
Written by Kiran Krishna. Narrated with an AI voice. · LinkedIn
In this episode
- 0:01In June 2025, Anthropic reported that a team of AI agents beat a single agent by 90%, on its own test of…
- 0:58Here's the plan.
- 1:09So where do you start?
- 4:13But what if you can't write the steps down at all?
- 6:08So should you just ask the model to check its own work?
- 7:46So if one agent is good, are five better?
- 10:28So, when does adding more actually help?
Sources check every one
- Anthropic, How we built our multi-agent research system (June 2025: a team 90% better than one agent on Anthropic's own research test; the S&P 500 board members; about 4× and 15× the tokens of a chat) anthropic.com
- Cognition, Don't Build Multi-Agents (June 2025, the day before Anthropic's post: the Flappy Bird example; actions carry decisions) cognition.com
- Anthropic, Building effective agents (December 2024: the five workflow patterns; the gate; finding the simplest solution) anthropic.com
- Anthropic, Multi-agent coordination patterns: Five approaches and when to use them (April 2026: the name generator and verifier) claude.com
- Yao et al. 2022, ReAct (a text game of household chores: 71% of tasks finished with thoughts written down, 45% without; best of 6 prompts) arxiv.org
- Anthropic docs, Thinking (newer models think between tool calls automatically) platform.claude.com
- Claude Code docs, Choose a permission mode (plan mode: edits wait until you approve the plan) code.claude.com
- LangChain, Plan-and-Execute Agents (February 2024: writing the whole plan first, and re-planning) langchain.com
- Huang et al. 2023, Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet (Google DeepMind: every model got worse with no outside feedback; GPT-3.5 from 76% to 38% on common-sense questions; running the code as the check) arxiv.org
- Madaan et al. 2023, Self-Refine (ChatGPT checking its own math: about 1 answer in 4 wrong, yet "everything looks good" 94% of the time) arxiv.org
- DeepSeek-AI, DeepSeek-R1 (Nature 2025: a reasoning model that learned to check its work in training) arxiv.org
- Self-Correction Bench (COLM 2026: reasoning models check as they think) arxiv.org
- Liu & Meng 2026, Self-Correction as Feedback Control (preprint, school maths only: a second look barely moves recent models) arxiv.org
- Kamoi et al. 2024, When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? (TACL survey: self-correction works with reliable outside feedback) arxiv.org
- Claude Code docs, Best practices (running out of context is rarely the problem now, so a fresh context is about keeping it uncluttered) code.claude.com
- Anthropic, Building multi-agent systems: When and how to use them (January 2026: a clean context for each subagent; coordination often costs more than it brings) claude.com
- Kim et al. 2025, Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems (Google Research, v3 April 2026: about 80% better on work that splits, up to 70% worse on step-by-step planning) arxiv.org
- LangChain, How and when to build multi-agent systems (June 2025: reading splits better than writing) langchain.com
- Cognition, Multi-Agents: What's Actually Working (April 2026: extra agents add intelligence, not actions; one agent does the writing) cognition.com
- Anthropic, Building agents: When to fold subagents into your main agent loop (October 2026: using fewer subagents) claude.com
